What are the Pros and Cons of having a Cell Tower?

Cell Tower: If you’re a property owner who’s noticed numerous cell towers recently being built
in your area, your land could also be a potential candidate for a cell tower

For landowners considering having one on their land it’s essential to know what a
cell tower is and what are the pros and cons of having one.

What is a cell tower, and why is it important?

A cell tower or cell site is a cellular-enabled mobile device site containing
electronic equipment and an antenna, typically built as a tall structure like a
tower its purpose is to provide network coverage to mobile phone users in its

Supply and demand for coverage will depend on the area and its subscribers to cellular
services, subsequently affecting how much a cell tower lease is worth.

However, as supply and demand have continued to increase throughout the years due to
newer 5G networks, more and more property owners have enjoyed the additional
income that a cell tower brings.

Pros of having a cell site It’s a good source of revenue

If you happen to own a commercial building,
you may not realize how well rooftop sites typically pay. The prioritization of
rooftop sites in metropolitan areas is mainly due to the high population of
inhabitants requiring adequate cellular coverage.

A premium rooftop site in NY Manhattan, for example, brings in as much as $4,000
a month.

For landowners located in rural areas, unfortunately, the rental income generated
from a cell site on average isn’t as high as a rooftop site. However, it is still a good investment where you can receive a substantial amount of revenue every month over a long duration, or you can sell your cell tower lease for a lump sum payment.

Another perk that landowners have is the lack of start-up costs when investing and
receiving an immediate income stream right off the bat. Landowners wishing to
maximize their potential earnings long term could benefit from
hiring a cell tower consultantduring negotiations.

Maintenance of occupants

Residential tenants living in an apartment you’ve rented out and a wireless carrier
occupying your cell tower will differ substantially. Although both fit the
description of being residents, a wireless carrier will require less time and
effort to accommodate.

As wireless carriers maintain the area they lease, the costs of construction for
their infrastructure is paid for by them.

You have better cellular coverage

Cell provider subscribers who live near a cell site will benefit from better service
with significantly less downtime.

Particularly useful for business owners who regularly communicate in online calls superior
coverage ensures that day to day business operations run smoother without

Having multiple wireless occupants could increase
lease value

If your cell site is in demand, you will likely have multiple interested wireless
carriers eventually occupying your cell site. Cell sites accommodating more
than one carrier is particularly evident in areas where cell-site land is in
demand but are in limited supply.

As a result, landowners wishing to sell their lease can gain leverage during
negotiations, allowing them to choose a lump-sum for payment.

A higher number of buyout offers brought to the table creates a competitive
bidding scenario amongst buyout companies, resulting in Landowners receiving
the highest offer from its bidders.

Cons of having a Cell tower Lease Agreements with long durations

Cell tower lease agreements that provide rent over thirty years may seem profitable,
but there may be repercussions to having such a prolonged duration.

Landowners cannot predict a cell tower’s value for the future because of its ever-changing

It’s certainly possible a cell tower could lose its usefulness over time due to a
gradual decrease in cellular demand in the area, and at worst making the cell
site obsolete.

Right of First Refusal Clause

Wireless carriers often gain the upper hand in contract negotiations by implementing a
Right of First Refusal (ROFR) clause.

When wireless carriers implement a contract’s ROFR clause property owners attempting
to sell their lease agreement are not only required to give adequate notice to
the carrier but also inform them the amount that was offered for their lease.

Wireless carriers can then match or exceed offers from companies specializing in cell tower lease buyouts. This clause can potentially stop new offers from third parties, decreasing how much you could possibly earn from the lease.

Property value potentially losing its value

Landowners wishing to have a cell tower on their land could unknowingly reduce their property’s value.
Cell sites situated near residential areas could dissuade people from moving in
as many believe cell waves contribute to adverse health issues.

Furthermore, your cell tower may be deemed as visually unaesthetic, sticking out like a sore
thumb for residents.

You may also encounter opposition within your area, namely your neighbours who
don’t appreciate the construction of a cell site in close proximity to them.

An increase of vehicular and foot traffic, i.e. service trucks and cell tower
engineers on your property will most likely annoy residents.

When selling your property, all of these issues could impact the value of your
property if fewer buyers are interested.

Share This


Wordpress (0)